Skill demand compared
MongoDB vs. DynamoDB vs. Cassandra
How often each appears in job posts, how demand is moving, who asks for it and what it pays - from job posts sourced directly from company career sites.
In short
- Which is more in demand: MongoDB, DynamoDB or Cassandra?
- MongoDB - it appears in 0.2% of job posts (11,218 in the last 90 days), vs. DynamoDB 0.1%; Cassandra 0.0%.
- Is MongoDB, DynamoDB or Cassandra growing faster?
- Neither is growing; DynamoDB is declining least, measured by the change in the share of job posts over the last three completed months vs. the three before: MongoDB -18%; DynamoDB -9%; Cassandra -13%.
- Which pays more: MongoDB, DynamoDB or Cassandra?
- Cassandra job posts advertise the highest median salary (USD per year, last 12 months, pooled across countries): MongoDB $142,500; DynamoDB $149,000; Cassandra $156,800.
- Which is more often remote: MongoDB, DynamoDB or Cassandra?
- DynamoDB - 46% of its job posts in the last 90 days offer remote or hybrid work.
Share of job posts per month
Side by side
Cite this data
jobdata API. (2026, November 14). MongoDB vs. DynamoDB vs. Cassandra: demand in job posts [Data set]. Retrieved November 14, 2026, from https://jobdataapi.com/skill-demand/compare/mongodb-vs-dynamodb-vs-cassandra/
Download CSV
Markdown
Data as of Nov 14, 2026. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page · Methodology
More comparisons
Share of all job posts from active companies whose title or description mentions the skill as a phrase; completed calendar months. Methodology · Markdown version
Explore jobdata API with AI tools
Ask an AI assistant how to search and build with live job data.